🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for various offences “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, adding that underage people should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which includes rising levels of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.